Trusted by 3,500+ doctors & students
Medical AI
EvidenceNephrologyFLOW
Evidence explainer · Outcome trial

FLOW: semaglutide and the kidney - in diabetic CKD.

In type 2 diabetes with chronic kidney disease, semaglutide 1.0 mg cut a composite of major kidney events plus cardiovascular death by about 24% (HR 0.76). The trial was stopped early for efficacy and led to the Ozempic kidney label expansion.

Verified against the cited primary sources. Not medical advice; read alongside the sources. FLOW enrolled a type 2 diabetes population with CKD, distinct from the SELECT cardiovascular trial. Effect estimates are intention-to-treat; confirm against the primary publication and current labeling.

FLOW is the dedicated kidney-outcome trial of semaglutide. It randomized 3,533 adults with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease to once-weekly semaglutide 1.0 mg or placebo, on top of standard care, and followed them for major kidney and cardiovascular outcomes.[1,2]

Stopped early for efficacy at a prespecified interim analysis

The trial met its primary endpoint convincingly: semaglutide reduced the primary composite outcome by about 24% versus placebo, with a hazard ratio of 0.76 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.88).[1] The independent data monitoring committee recommended stopping the trial early when a prespecified interim analysis showed clear benefit.[1]

Key takeaway

In type 2 diabetes with CKD, semaglutide 1.0 mg cut a composite of major kidney events plus cardiovascular death by about 24% (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.88), and the trial stopped early for efficacy.[1] This supported the FDA expansion of the Ozempic label in January 2025.[3]

What the primary outcome measured

The primary outcome was a composite of major kidney disease events plus cardiovascular death, specifically: onset of kidney failure (dialysis, transplantation, or an eGFR below 15 mL/min/1.73 m2), at least a 50% reduction in eGFR from baseline, or death from kidney-related or cardiovascular causes.[1] Bundling kidney failure, steep eGFR decline, and vascular death into one endpoint captures the outcomes that matter most to patients with CKD.

FLOW at a glance. Effect estimates are for the primary composite outcome unless noted.

FeatureFLOW
PopulationType 2 diabetes with chronic kidney disease
InterventionSemaglutide 1.0 mg once weekly vs placebo
Randomized3,533 participants
Primary compositeMajor kidney events (kidney failure, >= 50% eGFR decline) plus death from kidney-related or cardiovascular causes [1]
Primary resultHR 0.76 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.88); about 24% risk reduction [1]
Trial statusStopped early for efficacy at interim analysis [1]

A diabetic CKD population, not SELECT

FLOW is specific to type 2 diabetes with CKD. That framing is important: it is a different population from the SELECT cardiovascular trial, which studied semaglutide in people with overweight or obesity and established cardiovascular disease but without diabetes. The kidney-protection signal in FLOW should be read within its diabetic CKD population, and not generalized to nondiabetic CKD on the strength of this trial alone.[1,2]

The regulatory follow-through

On January 28, 2025, the FDA expanded the Ozempic (semaglutide) label to include reducing the risk of worsening kidney disease (kidney disease progression), kidney failure (end-stage kidney disease), and death due to cardiovascular disease in adults with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease, based on FLOW.[3] That made semaglutide the first GLP-1 receptor agonist with this kidney indication.

A 24% reduction in major kidney events plus cardiovascular death, in diabetic CKD, with a trial stopped early for benefit - that is what moved semaglutide into kidney-protective labeling.- Section synthesis
§ Ask your own

The library is curated. The product is asked.

An outcome trial like FLOW raises practical questions: which patients, alongside which background therapy (SGLT2 inhibitors, RAS blockade), and how the kidney and cardiovascular benefits stack. Ask, and read the trial.

This explainer is verified against the cited primary sources. Trial figures, the composite definition, and labeling details should be confirmed against the primary publication and current labeling before clinical use.

Open the product →