Trusted by 3,500+ doctors & students
Medical AI
Comparevs OpenEvidence
Head to head · Clinical AI

Medical AI vs OpenEvidence.

Both reason the evidence through the specific case and cite every claim. The differences that matter in practice are the built-in calculator suite, who is allowed to use it (Medical AI opens to students and residents, not only verified clinicians), and one subscription that follows you across web and iOS.

§ The verdict

OpenEvidence is a strong, well-resourced answer engine and free to the clinicians it verifies. Choose Medical AI when you want 40+ validated calculators next to the answers, when you are a student or resident shut out by a verification wall, or when you want a single subscription across web and iOS. Both reason about the case and cite their sources, and both are references, not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Start free →
§ Feature comparison

Side by side

Medical AIthis toolOpenEvidence
Tailored, patient-specific answersYes, synthesized for the caseYes, for verified users
Cited, evidence-grounded answersResearch, guidelines, drug labelsStrong, cited
Validated clinical calculators40+ built inNot the focus
Curated reference libraryYes, growingAnswer-focused
Open toClinicians & students, no wallVerified clinicians only
Platforms & billingWeb + iOS, one linked subscriptionWeb + mobile
Price$20/mo or $180/yr · free daily tierFree to verified clinicians

Compiled from publicly available information and direct testing. Confirm current capabilities and access terms at the source.

The honest summary

OpenEvidence is a serious product. Like Medical AI, it reasons the evidence through the specific case and returns a cited answer, it is free to the clinicians it verifies, and it is backed by real medical-publishing partnerships. On the core job of answering a clinical question well, the two are genuinely comparable.

Medical AI competes on what surrounds the answer: 40+ validated calculators next to the engine, a curated library, one subscription linked across web and iOS, and open access for students and residents rather than verified clinicians only. It is a premium tool, used daily by clinicians across the US, Canada, and Europe, that simply does not gatekeep who can use it.

Open to the whole team

OpenEvidence verifies that you are a licensed clinician before it will answer. That is a defensible design choice, but it locks out medical students and residents early in training, the people learning the evidence in the first place. Medical AI makes the opposite choice: the same reasoned, cited answers are available to attendings, residents, and students alike, with no verification wall to clear before your first question.

Answers, calculators, and a library in one place

Both tools answer clinical questions well and tailor the answer to the case you describe. Medical AI adds the parts of the day that are not prose: 40+ validated calculators (Wells, A-a gradient, corrected QT, BMI, creatinine clearance, and more), each with its formula and sources shown, plus a curated reference library for the questions clinicians search most. One tool covers the look-up, the math, and the read.

One subscription across web and iOS

Medical AI's subscription is account-bound, not device-bound. Buy Pro on iOS and the web unlocks for the same login; subscribe on the web and the app honours it, with no double billing. Pricing is public at $20 a month or $180 a year, and a free daily tier lets you judge the answers and their citations before paying.

§ The difference

Reasons to choose Medical AI

Calculators included

40+ validated clinical calculators next to the answer engine, each with its formula and sources.

Open to the whole team

Attendings, residents, and students alike. Ask your first question without clearing a verification wall.

Web and iOS, one account

Entitlements follow the account, not the device. Buy once, use everywhere, no double billing.

A curated library too

Reasoned answers, plus a growing library of cited references for the questions clinicians search most.

§ Frequently asked

Questions people ask.

Is Medical AI better than OpenEvidence?

Neither is strictly better; they fit different needs. Both reason about the case and cite their answers. Medical AI is the better fit if you want a built-in calculator suite, if you are a student or resident shut out by verification, or if you want one subscription across web and iOS. OpenEvidence is excellent and free for the clinicians it verifies.

Do I need to be a verified clinician to use Medical AI?

No. Medical AI is open to clinicians and students alike, with no verification wall. It is intended for clinicians and learners and is a reference tool, not a substitute for professional judgement.

Does Medical AI cite its sources like OpenEvidence?

Yes. Both follow a retrieve-then-cite approach. Medical AI grounds answers in peer-reviewed research, society guidelines, and FDA and EMA drug labels, and links each claim to its source.

How much does Medical AI cost?

There is a free daily tier. Pro is $20 a month or $180 a year and includes unlimited questions, Best and Research modes, file attachments, and real-time web retrieval, across web and iOS.

§ Try it yourself

Same cited answers, more around them.

Reasoned, cited clinical answers, plus 40+ calculators, a curated library, and web and iOS on one subscription, open to the whole care team. Start on the free daily tier.

This comparison is based on publicly available information and direct testing, and reflects our understanding at the time of writing. OpenEvidence may change its features, access terms, and pricing; confirm current details at openevidence.com. Medical AI is an information and reference tool for clinicians, not medical advice or a diagnostic device.

Open the product →