The OpenEvidence alternative that reasons about your case.

The answer is for your case, not the average patient

This is the difference that matters. A guideline or a topic review tells you the population rule. A literature search hands you papers to read. Neither one accounts for the patient actually in front of you. Medical AI takes the specific case (the renal function, the comorbidities, the current medications, the local formulary) and works the evidence through it, then cites every claim so you can check the source. It is the difference between looking something up and getting an answer.

That is also the honest test for any clinical AI. A tool that only retrieves is a better search engine; a tool that reasons about the case is a clinical reference. Medical AI is built to do the second, and to show its work: each conclusion links to the research, guideline, or label it rests on, and where the evidence is thin the answer says so.

Cited, with the same discipline

The grounding is non-negotiable. Medical AI retrieves first, from peer-reviewed research, society guidelines (NICE, USPSTF, KDIGO, AHA/ACC, IDSA and others), and FDA and EMA drug labels, then composes an answer where each claim links to the page it came from. You read the source, not just a paraphrase. OpenEvidence shares this discipline and does it well; the difference is everything built around the answer.

Open to the whole team

OpenEvidence verifies that you are a licensed clinician before it will answer, which locks out the people who arguably need the evidence most while they learn: medical students and residents early in training. Medical AI is open to the whole care team. The same reasoned, cited answers are available to attendings, residents, and students alike, with no verification wall to clear first.

This is not a budget or second-tier tool. Medical AI is used every day by clinicians across the US, Canada, and Europe, and rated 4.7 on the App Store across more than a thousand reviews. It is a premium clinical reference that simply does not gatekeep who gets to use it.

Calculators, not just a chat box

A lot of clinical work is arithmetic, not prose: a Wells score, an A-a gradient, a corrected QT, an ideal body weight, a creatinine clearance. Medical AI ships 40+ validated calculators next to the answer engine, each one a real implementation with the formula and its sources shown, so a single tool covers both the question and the math. That breadth is where a focused Q&A product tends to stop.

One subscription, web and iOS

Medical AI runs on the web at medicalaiapp.com and as an iOS app, and the subscription is linked at the account, not the device. Buy Pro on iOS and the web unlocks for the same login; subscribe on the web and the app honours it, with no double billing. Pricing is public at $20 a month or $180 a year, with a free daily tier so you can judge the quality of the answers and their citations before paying anything.